苏州混凝土水泥制品研究院有限公司

头部文案

发布时间:2020-01-06 00:00:00
全国建材科技期刊
全国中文核心期刊
中国科技论文统计源期刊
万方数据-数字化期刊群入网期刊
中国学术期刊(光盘版)全文收录期刊
华东地区优秀科技期刊
江苏省期刊方阵“双效期刊”
中国期刊网全文收录期刊
中国科技期刊数据库全文收录期刊
单桩水平静载试验结果数学拟合研究
Mathematical Fitting Study of Horizontal Static Load Test Results of Single Pile
2011年第5期
桩;水平静载试验;水平承载性状;数学模型
Piles; Horizontal static load test; Horizontal load character; Mathematical model
2011年第5期
1000-4637(2011)05-31-05
卓维松
福建交通职业技术学院土建系,福州 350007

卓维松

浏览量:
1000
摘 要:基于福州盆地3根PHC管桩和2根冲孔灌注桩水平静载试验结果,对单桩水平荷载位移曲线进行数学拟合研究。研究发现,①冲孔灌注桩单桩水平荷载位移曲线呈双曲线和幂级数形态,PHC管桩呈直线形态;②对PHC管桩单桩水平荷载位移曲线直线模型拟合效果最优,基于该数学模型的桩顶水平荷载计算值与实测值的误差一般为-7.53%~20.74%,说明用直线模型针对PHC管桩水平荷载位移曲线的拟合是较为精确和可靠的;③双曲线模型和幂函数模型均能对冲孔灌注桩单桩水平荷载位移曲线进行合理拟合,基于双曲线模型的桩顶水平荷载计算值与实测值的误差一般为-10.99%~18.91%,基于幂函数模型的桩顶水平荷载计算值与实测值的误差一般为-16.03%~9.96%。 Abstract: Based on the test results of horizontal static load for three PHC piles and two drop impact-cone concrete piles in Fuzhou Basin, a mathematical fitting study is carried out on the pile horizontal load displacement curve. The results show that: 1) The pile horizontal load displacement curve of drop impact-cone concrete piles is in hyperbolic and power series shape while the one of PHC piles is in linear shape. 2) The fitting effect of linear model is the best for pile horizontal load displacement curve of PHC piles, and on the basis of such mathematical model, the error of calculated value and measured value for pile top horizontal load is generally between -7.53% to 20.74%, which means the fitting for horizontal load displacement curve of PHC piles is relatively accurate and reliable by means of linear model. 3) The pile horizontal load displacement curve of drop impact-cone concrete piles can be reasonably fitted both through hyperbolic model and power function model. Based on the hyperbolic model, the error of calculated value and measured value for pile top horizontal load is generally between -10.99% to 18.91%, while based on power function model, the error of calculated value and measured value for pile top horizontal load is generally between -16.03% to 9.96%.
英文名 : Mathematical Fitting Study of Horizontal Static Load Test Results of Single Pile
刊期 : 2011年第5期
关键词 : 桩;水平静载试验;水平承载性状;数学模型
Key words : Piles; Horizontal static load test; Horizontal load character; Mathematical model
刊期 : 2011年第5期
DOI :
文章编号 : 1000-4637(2011)05-31-05
基金项目 :
作者 : 卓维松
单位 : 福建交通职业技术学院土建系,福州 350007

卓维松

摘要
参数
结论
参考文献
引用本文

摘   要:基于福州盆地3根PHC管桩和2根冲孔灌注桩水平静载试验结果,对单桩水平荷载位移曲线进行数学拟合研究。研究发现,①冲孔灌注桩单桩水平荷载位移曲线呈双曲线和幂级数形态,PHC管桩呈直线形态;②对PHC管桩单桩水平荷载位移曲线直线模型拟合效果最优,基于该数学模型的桩顶水平荷载计算值与实测值的误差一般为-7.53%~20.74%,说明用直线模型针对PHC管桩水平荷载位移曲线的拟合是较为精确和可靠的;③双曲线模型和幂函数模型均能对冲孔灌注桩单桩水平荷载位移曲线进行合理拟合,基于双曲线模型的桩顶水平荷载计算值与实测值的误差一般为-10.99%~18.91%,基于幂函数模型的桩顶水平荷载计算值与实测值的误差一般为-16.03%~9.96%。

Abstract: Based on the test results of horizontal static load for three PHC piles and two drop impact-cone concrete piles in Fuzhou Basin, a mathematical fitting study is carried out on the pile horizontal load displacement curve. The results show that: 1) The pile horizontal load displacement curve of drop impact-cone concrete piles is in hyperbolic and power series shape while the one of PHC piles is in linear shape. 2) The fitting effect of linear model is the best for pile horizontal load displacement curve of PHC piles, and on the basis of such mathematical model, the error of calculated value and measured value for pile top horizontal load is generally between -7.53% to 20.74%, which means the fitting for horizontal load displacement curve of PHC piles is relatively accurate and reliable by means of linear model. 3) The pile horizontal load displacement curve of drop impact-cone concrete piles can be reasonably fitted both through hyperbolic model and power function model. Based on the hyperbolic model, the error of calculated value and measured value for pile top horizontal load is generally between -10.99% to 18.91%, while based on power function model, the error of calculated value and measured value for pile top horizontal load is generally between -16.03% to 9.96%.

关键词:
桩;水平静载试验;水平承载性状;数学模型
扫二维码用手机看
未找到相应参数组,请于后台属性模板中添加
(1)冲孔灌注桩单桩水平荷载位移曲线呈双曲线和幂级数形态,PHC管桩呈直线形态。
(2)对PHC管桩单桩水平荷载位移曲线采用直线模型拟合效果最优,基于该数学模型的桩顶水平荷载计算值与实测值的误差一般为-7.53%20.74%,说明用直线模型针对PHC管桩水平荷载位移曲线的拟合是较为精确和可靠的。
(3)双曲线模型和幂函数模型均能对冲孔灌注桩单桩水平荷载位移曲线进行合理拟合,基于双曲线模型的桩顶水平荷载计算值与实测值的误差一般为-10.99%~18.91%,基于幂函数模型的桩顶水平荷载计算值与实测值的误差一般为-16.03%~9.96%。
上述研究结果可供同类地区单桩水平极限承载力预测参考使用,但我们更应该看到,充分利用已有的现场试验桩资料,研究桩基承载性状并建立数据库,是克服桩基础理论与实际相脱离,科学合理地进行桩基础设计的关键。
[1] 江学良,曹平,付军. 大直径嵌岩灌注桩水平荷载试验研究[J]. 工程勘察, 2009(3): 16-20.
[2] 马志涛. 水平荷载下桩基受力特性研究综述[J]. 河海大学学报, 2006,34(5): 546-551.
[3] 中国建筑科学研究院. JGJ94-2008建筑桩基技术规范[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2008.
[4] 蒋建平,高广运,刘文白. 扩底桩上拔荷载-位移曲线的Richards模型拟合研究[J]. 工程力学, 2009, 26(5): 189-201.
[5] 刘俊龙. 双曲线法预测单桩极限承载力的讨论[J]. 岩土工程技术, 2001(4):206-217.
[6] 许宏发, 钱七虎, 金丰年. 描述抗拔桩荷载-位移曲线的幂函数模型[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2000, 22(5):549-554.
[7] 党发宁,刘娜, 何文安. 西安地区单桩荷载传递双曲线模型与工程应用[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2007, 29(9):1428-1432. 

相关文件

暂时没有内容信息显示
请先在网站后台添加数据记录。

关注《混凝土与水泥制品》

总访问量 468,401   网站统计

官方微信公众号关闭
苏州混凝土水泥制品研究院有限公司

关于我们    |    联系我们    |    订购杂志    |    回到顶部

版权所有:中国混凝土与水泥制品网  苏ICP备10086386号   网站建设:中企动力 苏州

版权所有:中国混凝土与水泥制品网

苏ICP备10086386号

网站建设:中企动力 苏州