苏州混凝土水泥制品研究院有限公司

头部文案

发布时间:2020-01-06 00:00:00
全国建材科技期刊
全国中文核心期刊
中国科技论文统计源期刊
万方数据-数字化期刊群入网期刊
中国学术期刊(光盘版)全文收录期刊
华东地区优秀科技期刊
江苏省期刊方阵“双效期刊”
中国期刊网全文收录期刊
中国科技期刊数据库全文收录期刊
不同隔振方案下混凝土框架结构的抗震性能对比与优化分析
Analysis of Seismic Performance of Concrete Frame Structure Under Different Vibration Isolation Schemes
2021年第10期
基础隔振;层间隔振;混凝土框架;模糊综合评价;抗震性能
Foundation vibration isolation; Interlayer vibration; Concrete frame; Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation; Seismic performance
2021年第10期
10.19761/j.1000-4637.2021.10.072.05
浙江省基础公益研究计划项目(LQ20E080025)。
卢红霞1,周振纲2
1.嘉兴南湖学院,浙江 嘉兴 314001;2.嘉兴学院 建筑工程学院,浙江 嘉兴314001

卢红霞1,周振纲2

卢红霞,周振纲.不同隔振方案下混凝土框架结构的抗震性能对比与优化分析[J].混凝土与水泥制品,2021(10):72-76.

LU H X,ZHOU Z G.Analysis of Seismic Performance of Concrete Frame Structure Under Different Vibration Isolation Schemes[J].China Concrete and Cement Products,2021(10):72-76.

浏览量:
1000
摘   要:为了分析和对比不同隔振方案下混凝土框架结构的抗震性能,建立了混凝土框架三维模型,设定基础隔振、2层隔振、4层隔振和6层隔振四种隔振方案,对地震输入参数和隔振支座参数进行了研究,依据SAP软件内置的EL波和CPC波,分析了模型的基础剪应力、层间剪应力和顶层结构加速变化规律。结果表明:不同地震波输入后,有隔振的模型层间剪应力、基础剪应力和顶层加速度相较于无隔振方案均大幅降低,但水平方向上差别不大;采用基础隔振和2层隔振后,模型的基础剪应力从10 988~13 666 kN降至2 366~3 544 kN,降低幅度达73%~81%;四种隔振方案的综合评价值分别为0.89、0.91、0.83和0.70,其中,2层隔振方案的施工成本和抗震性能均最优,基础隔振方案次之,但施工成本稍高,4层和6层隔振方案较差。 Abstract: In order to analyze and compare the seismic performance of concrete frame structure under different vibration isolation schemes, a three-dimensional model of concrete frame structure was established, and four vibration isolation schemes were set for foundation vibration isolation, 2-story vibration isolation, 4-story vibration isolation, and 6-story vibration isolation, and the seismic input parameters and vibration isolation support parameters were studied. According to the built-in EL wave and CPC wave of SAP software, the variation laws of foundation shear stress, interlayer shear stress and acceleration of top structure of the model were analyzed. The results show that after different seismic waves are input, the interlayer shear stress,  foundation shear stress and top floor acceleration of the vibration isolation model are significantly reduced compared with those without vibration isolation scheme, but there is little difference in the horizontal direction. For foundation vibration isolation and 2-story vibration isolation, the foundation shear stress of the model decreases from 10 988~13 666 kN to 2 366~3 544 kN, with a reduction range of 73%~81%. The comprehensive evaluation values of the four vibration isolation schemes are 0.89, 0.91, 0.83 and 0.70 respectively. Among them, the construction cost and seismic performance of the 2-story vibration isolation scheme are the best, and the foundation vibration isolation scheme is the second, but the construction cost is slightly higher, and the 4-story and 6-story vibration isolation schemes are poor.
英文名 : Analysis of Seismic Performance of Concrete Frame Structure Under Different Vibration Isolation Schemes
刊期 : 2021年第10期
关键词 : 基础隔振;层间隔振;混凝土框架;模糊综合评价;抗震性能
Key words : Foundation vibration isolation; Interlayer vibration; Concrete frame; Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation; Seismic performance
刊期 : 2021年第10期
DOI : 10.19761/j.1000-4637.2021.10.072.05
文章编号 :
基金项目 : 浙江省基础公益研究计划项目(LQ20E080025)。
作者 : 卢红霞1,周振纲2
单位 : 1.嘉兴南湖学院,浙江 嘉兴 314001;2.嘉兴学院 建筑工程学院,浙江 嘉兴314001

卢红霞1,周振纲2

卢红霞,周振纲.不同隔振方案下混凝土框架结构的抗震性能对比与优化分析[J].混凝土与水泥制品,2021(10):72-76.

LU H X,ZHOU Z G.Analysis of Seismic Performance of Concrete Frame Structure Under Different Vibration Isolation Schemes[J].China Concrete and Cement Products,2021(10):72-76.

摘要
参数
结论
参考文献
引用本文

摘   要:为了分析和对比不同隔振方案下混凝土框架结构的抗震性能,建立了混凝土框架三维模型,设定基础隔振、2层隔振、4层隔振和6层隔振四种隔振方案,对地震输入参数和隔振支座参数进行了研究,依据SAP软件内置的EL波和CPC波,分析了模型的基础剪应力、层间剪应力和顶层结构加速变化规律。结果表明:不同地震波输入后,有隔振的模型层间剪应力、基础剪应力和顶层加速度相较于无隔振方案均大幅降低,但水平方向上差别不大;采用基础隔振和2层隔振后,模型的基础剪应力从10 988~13 666 kN降至2 366~3 544 kN,降低幅度达73%~81%;四种隔振方案的综合评价值分别为0.89、0.91、0.83和0.70,其中,2层隔振方案的施工成本和抗震性能均最优,基础隔振方案次之,但施工成本稍高,4层和6层隔振方案较差。

Abstract: In order to analyze and compare the seismic performance of concrete frame structure under different vibration isolation schemes, a three-dimensional model of concrete frame structure was established, and four vibration isolation schemes were set for foundation vibration isolation, 2-story vibration isolation, 4-story vibration isolation, and 6-story vibration isolation, and the seismic input parameters and vibration isolation support parameters were studied. According to the built-in EL wave and CPC wave of SAP software, the variation laws of foundation shear stress, interlayer shear stress and acceleration of top structure of the model were analyzed. The results show that after different seismic waves are input, the interlayer shear stress,  foundation shear stress and top floor acceleration of the vibration isolation model are significantly reduced compared with those without vibration isolation scheme, but there is little difference in the horizontal direction. For foundation vibration isolation and 2-story vibration isolation, the foundation shear stress of the model decreases from 10 988~13 666 kN to 2 366~3 544 kN, with a reduction range of 73%~81%. The comprehensive evaluation values of the four vibration isolation schemes are 0.89, 0.91, 0.83 and 0.70 respectively. Among them, the construction cost and seismic performance of the 2-story vibration isolation scheme are the best, and the foundation vibration isolation scheme is the second, but the construction cost is slightly higher, and the 4-story and 6-story vibration isolation schemes are poor.

扫二维码用手机看
未找到相应参数组,请于后台属性模板中添加

(1)采用不同地震波输入后,建筑物的层间剪应力、基础剪应力和顶层加速度相较于无隔振方案均大幅降低,但是水平方向上差别不大。
(2)通过减震率对比和模糊综合评价,计算出基础隔振、2层隔振、4层隔振和6层隔振方案的综合评价值分别为0.89、0.91、0.83、0.70,整体上来说,基础隔振和2层隔振方案更适用于抗震结构。

[1] 李宗凯.框架+支撑结构在车辆段上盖住宅开发工程中的应用与研究[J].建筑结构,2020,50(21):76-83.
[2] 叶昆,徐誉铭,倪管乐,等.基础隔震结构直接基于位移的一体化抗震设计方法[J/OL].建筑结构学报,2020(11):1-10[2020-12-28].https://doi.org/10.14006/j.jzjgxb.2020.0354.
[3] 丁捷,周旭,黄可.十字型ECC框架节点在循环荷载下的抗震性能分析[J].混凝土与水泥制品,2020(12):68-72.
[4] RYAN K L,EARL C L.Analysis and design of inter-story isolation  systems  with  nonlinear devices[J].Journal of Earthquake Engineering,2010,14(7):1044-1062.
[5] HU M,SI H J,LI K N,et al.Earthquake response analysis of a mid-story seismic isolated building[C].Canada:13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering,2004:1456-1465.
[6] SUEOKA T,TORII S,TSUNEKI Y.The application of response conteol design  using  isolation system to high-risebuilding[C].Canada:13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering,2004:3457-3472.
[7] 袁正国.基于Simulink的基础隔震和层间隔震地震反应分析[J].世界地震工程,2014,30(4):212-217.
[8] 宋晓,谭平,周福霖,等.层间隔震结构参数分析与减震性能研究[J].地震工程与工程振动,2018,38(5):41-49.
[9] 陈思成.Pushover分析方法在RC框架隔震结构的应用研究[D].北京:北京建筑大学,2020.
[10] 王啸楠.基础隔震混凝土框架-剪力墙结构受力性能研究[D].北京:北京建筑大学,2020.
[11] 柴笑天.特高压直流隔离开关地震响应及复合隔震技术研究[D].北京:北方工业大学,2020.
[12] 黄磊.近断层地震作用下框排架结构易损性分析[D].西安:西安科技大学,2020.

卢红霞,周振纲.不同隔振方案下混凝土框架结构的抗震性能对比与优化分析[J].混凝土与水泥制品,2021(10):72-76.

LU H X,ZHOU Z G.Analysis of Seismic Performance of Concrete Frame Structure Under Different Vibration Isolation Schemes[J].China Concrete and Cement Products,2021(10):72-76.

相关文件

暂时没有内容信息显示
请先在网站后台添加数据记录。

关注《混凝土与水泥制品》

总访问量 468,401   网站统计

官方微信公众号关闭
苏州混凝土水泥制品研究院有限公司

关于我们    |    联系我们    |    订购杂志    |    回到顶部

版权所有:中国混凝土与水泥制品网  苏ICP备10086386号   网站建设:中企动力 苏州

版权所有:中国混凝土与水泥制品网

苏ICP备10086386号

网站建设:中企动力 苏州