苏州混凝土水泥制品研究院有限公司

头部文案

发布时间:2020-01-06 00:00:00
全国建材科技期刊
全国中文核心期刊
中国科技论文统计源期刊
万方数据-数字化期刊群入网期刊
中国学术期刊(光盘版)全文收录期刊
华东地区优秀科技期刊
江苏省期刊方阵“双效期刊”
中国期刊网全文收录期刊
中国科技期刊数据库全文收录期刊
表面硬度法检测灌浆料实体强度试验研究
Experimental Study on Testing Solid Strength of Grouting Materials by Surface Hardness Method
2022年第8期
装配式建筑;灌浆料;检测龄期;抗压强度;表面硬度
Prefabricated building; Grouting material; Testing age; Compressive strength; Surface hardness
2022年第8期
10.19761/j.1000-4637.2022.08.078.05
江苏省建设系统科技项目(2020ZD60)。
赵建华1,凌良建2,吕 嘉2,谢慧晟2
1.南京市建筑工程质量安全监督站,江苏 南京 210007;2.南京市建筑工程质量安全检测中心,江苏 南京 210017

赵建华1,凌良建2,吕 嘉2,谢慧晟2

赵建华,凌良建,吕嘉,等.表面硬度法检测灌浆料实体强度试验研究[J].混凝土与水泥制品,2022(8):78-82.

ZHAO J H,LING L J,LYU Jia,et al.Experimental Study on Testing Solid Strength of Grouting Materials by Surface Hardness Method[J].China Concrete and Cement Products,2022(8):78-82.

浏览量:
1000
摘   要:研究了灌浆料标准试块抗压强度随龄期的变化规律,分析了表面硬度法检测灌浆料实体抗压强度的影响因素,建立了工程现场灌浆料表面硬度与抗压强度之间的测强曲线,并通过分析工程现场构件注浆孔端与出浆孔端灌浆料的表面硬度差异确定了合适的检测部位。结果表明:灌浆料抗压强度在前期增长较快,14 d后增长变缓,且14 d抗压强度能够达到28 d抗压强度的90%左右,故建议表面硬度法检测灌浆料实体抗压强度的最佳龄期应在14 d之后;出浆孔端灌浆料的表面硬度与抗压强度之间的相关性较差,而注浆孔端灌浆料的表面硬度与抗压强度之间的相关性较好,故建议表面硬度法检测灌浆料实体抗压强度的检测部位应选择注浆孔端;根据注浆孔端灌浆料的表面硬度与标准试块表面硬度之间的差异确定了二者之间的表面硬度修正量,可为表面硬度法检测灌浆料实体抗压强度的实际应用提供参考。 Abstract: The variation law of the compressive strength of the grouting material standard test block with age was studied, the influencing factors of testing the compressive strength of grouting material by surface hardness method were analyzed, and the strength-measurement curve between the surface hardness and compressive strength of grouting material in the project site was established, and the appropriate testing position was determined by analyzing the surface hardness difference between the grouting hole and the outlet hole of the components in the project site. The results show that the compressive strength of grouting material increases rapidly in the early stage, and slows down after 14 d, and the 14 d compressive strength can reach about 90% of the 28 d compressive strength. Therefore, it is suggested that the best age for testing the solid compressive strength of grouting materials by surface hardness method should be after 14 d. The correlation between the surface hardness at the location of the outlet hole and the compressive strength of the grouting material is poor, while the correlation between the surface hardness at the location of the grouting hole and the compressive strength of the grouting material is good. Therefore, it is suggested that the grouting hole should be selected as the detection position for testing the compressive strength of grouting material by surface hardness method. According to the difference between the surface hardness of the grouting hole position and the surface hardness of the grouting material standard test block, the surface hardness correction between the two is determined, which can provide a reference for the practical application of the surface hardness method to detect the compressive strength of the grouting material.
英文名 : Experimental Study on Testing Solid Strength of Grouting Materials by Surface Hardness Method
刊期 : 2022年第8期
关键词 : 装配式建筑;灌浆料;检测龄期;抗压强度;表面硬度
Key words : Prefabricated building; Grouting material; Testing age; Compressive strength; Surface hardness
刊期 : 2022年第8期
DOI : 10.19761/j.1000-4637.2022.08.078.05
文章编号 :
基金项目 : 江苏省建设系统科技项目(2020ZD60)。
作者 : 赵建华1,凌良建2,吕 嘉2,谢慧晟2
单位 : 1.南京市建筑工程质量安全监督站,江苏 南京 210007;2.南京市建筑工程质量安全检测中心,江苏 南京 210017

赵建华1,凌良建2,吕 嘉2,谢慧晟2

赵建华,凌良建,吕嘉,等.表面硬度法检测灌浆料实体强度试验研究[J].混凝土与水泥制品,2022(8):78-82.

ZHAO J H,LING L J,LYU Jia,et al.Experimental Study on Testing Solid Strength of Grouting Materials by Surface Hardness Method[J].China Concrete and Cement Products,2022(8):78-82.

摘要
参数
结论
参考文献
引用本文

摘   要:研究了灌浆料标准试块抗压强度随龄期的变化规律,分析了表面硬度法检测灌浆料实体抗压强度的影响因素,建立了工程现场灌浆料表面硬度与抗压强度之间的测强曲线,并通过分析工程现场构件注浆孔端与出浆孔端灌浆料的表面硬度差异确定了合适的检测部位。结果表明:灌浆料抗压强度在前期增长较快,14 d后增长变缓,且14 d抗压强度能够达到28 d抗压强度的90%左右,故建议表面硬度法检测灌浆料实体抗压强度的最佳龄期应在14 d之后;出浆孔端灌浆料的表面硬度与抗压强度之间的相关性较差,而注浆孔端灌浆料的表面硬度与抗压强度之间的相关性较好,故建议表面硬度法检测灌浆料实体抗压强度的检测部位应选择注浆孔端;根据注浆孔端灌浆料的表面硬度与标准试块表面硬度之间的差异确定了二者之间的表面硬度修正量,可为表面硬度法检测灌浆料实体抗压强度的实际应用提供参考。

Abstract: The variation law of the compressive strength of the grouting material standard test block with age was studied, the influencing factors of testing the compressive strength of grouting material by surface hardness method were analyzed, and the strength-measurement curve between the surface hardness and compressive strength of grouting material in the project site was established, and the appropriate testing position was determined by analyzing the surface hardness difference between the grouting hole and the outlet hole of the components in the project site. The results show that the compressive strength of grouting material increases rapidly in the early stage, and slows down after 14 d, and the 14 d compressive strength can reach about 90% of the 28 d compressive strength. Therefore, it is suggested that the best age for testing the solid compressive strength of grouting materials by surface hardness method should be after 14 d. The correlation between the surface hardness at the location of the outlet hole and the compressive strength of the grouting material is poor, while the correlation between the surface hardness at the location of the grouting hole and the compressive strength of the grouting material is good. Therefore, it is suggested that the grouting hole should be selected as the detection position for testing the compressive strength of grouting material by surface hardness method. According to the difference between the surface hardness of the grouting hole position and the surface hardness of the grouting material standard test block, the surface hardness correction between the two is determined, which can provide a reference for the practical application of the surface hardness method to detect the compressive strength of the grouting material.

扫二维码用手机看
未找到相应参数组,请于后台属性模板中添加

(1)灌浆料的抗压强度在早期(3 d)增长较快,7 d后增长变缓;14 d抗压强度已经能够达到28 d抗压强度的90%左右。因此,采用表面硬度法检测灌浆料实体抗压强度的龄期应在14 d之后。
(2)采用表面硬度法检测灌浆料实体抗压强度时,检测部位应选择注浆孔端。
(3)修正后的注浆孔端灌浆料里氏硬度值与抗压强度之间的相关性良好,可为表面硬度法检测灌浆料实体抗压强度的实际应用提供参考。

[1] 王铁柱,杨飞华,赵炜璇,等.装配式整体轻质内隔墙在建筑工业化中的研究与应用[J].混凝土与水泥制品,2021(12):75-78,83.
[2] 徐文兵.装配式混凝土建筑结构施工技术分析[J].低碳世界,2018(5):144-145.
[3] 许志远,余琼.四种灌浆连接节点的静力性能及比较分析[J].佳木斯大学学报(自然科学版),2015(5):715-719. 
[4] 刘全威,吴涛,李红,等.钢筋套筒灌浆连接件受力性能试验研究[J].工业建筑,2018(1):127-131. 
[5] 高润东,李向民,许清风.装配整体式混凝土建筑套筒灌浆存在问题与解决策略[J].施工技术,2018(10):1-4,10.
[6] 赵峥.高强混凝土配合比设计及其龄期强度规律研究[J]. 混凝土,2011(10):101-103.
[7] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.水泥基灌浆材料应用技术规范:GB/T 50448—2015[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2015.
[8] 国家标准化管理委员会.数据的统计处理和解释 正态样本离群值的判断和处理:GB/T 4883—2008[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2008.
[9] 江苏省市场监督管理局.装配整体式混凝土结构检测技术规程:DB32/T 3754—2020[S].南京:江苏凤凰科学技术出版社,2020.
[10] 李钢.回弹法检测水泥基灌浆料强度试验研究[D.石家庄:河北科技大学,2021.
[11] 吴玉龙,丁晨晨,顾盛,等.表面硬度法检测套筒灌浆料抗压强度试验研究[J].混凝土与水泥制品,2020(9):79-83.
[12] 熊静.回弹法评定混凝土抗压强度的主要影响因素及测强曲线的研究[D].广州:华南理工大学,2015.
[13] 石磊,崔士起,宋其伟,等.装配整体式混凝土结构工程灌浆套筒连接钢筋接头与水泥基灌浆料检测实例[J].建筑技术,2015,46(S2):402-403.
[14] 丁晨晨.钢筋连接用套筒灌浆料实体强度检测方法研究[D].镇江:江苏科技大学,2020.
[15] 董伟玮.加固灌浆料抗压强度现场检测问题研究[J].工业建筑,2015(S2):96-99.
[16] 曾凤娟,蔡善仕,魏金桥.钢筋连接用套筒灌浆料的试验研究[J].建筑工程技术与设计,2017(5):753,761.
[17] 孙彬,毛诗洋,张晋峰,等.钢筋套筒连接用灌浆料抗压强度影响因素试验研究[J].工程质量,2017(6):25-28.
[18] 李翀.超小直径芯样检测混凝土抗压强度的实验研究[D].北京:清华大学,2013.
[19] 黄海燕,张子明.混凝土的尺寸效应[J].混凝土,2004(3):8-9.

赵建华,凌良建,吕嘉,.表面硬度法检测灌浆料实体强度试验研究[J].混凝土与水泥制品,2022(8):78-82.

ZHAO J H,LING L J,LYU Jia,et al.Experimental Study on Testing Solid Strength of Grouting Materials by Surface Hardness Method[J].China Concrete and Cement Products,2022(8):78-82.

相关文件

暂时没有内容信息显示
请先在网站后台添加数据记录。

关注《混凝土与水泥制品》

总访问量 468,401   网站统计

官方微信公众号关闭
苏州混凝土水泥制品研究院有限公司

关于我们    |    联系我们    |    订购杂志    |    回到顶部

版权所有:中国混凝土与水泥制品网  苏ICP备10086386号   网站建设:中企动力 苏州

版权所有:中国混凝土与水泥制品网

苏ICP备10086386号

网站建设:中企动力 苏州