苏州混凝土水泥制品研究院有限公司

头部文案

发布时间:2020-01-06 00:00:00
全国建材科技期刊
全国中文核心期刊
中国科技论文统计源期刊
万方数据-数字化期刊群入网期刊
中国学术期刊(光盘版)全文收录期刊
华东地区优秀科技期刊
江苏省期刊方阵“双效期刊”
中国期刊网全文收录期刊
中国科技期刊数据库全文收录期刊
组合壳地下综合管廊关键节点力学性能试验研究
Experimental Study on Mechanical Properties of Key Joints of Composite Shell Underground Utility Tunnel
2023年第1期
组合壳综合管廊;节点;低周反复荷载试验;抗震性能;延性;刚度;承载力
Composite shell unitily tunnel; Key joint; Low cycle repeated load test; Seismic performance; Ductility; Stiffness; Bearing capacity
2023年第1期
10.19761/j.1000-4637.2023.01.039.08
李仁康1,姚爱军1,董 磊2
1.北京工业大学 城市建设学部,北京 100124;2.中铁建设集团有限公司,北京 100040

李仁康1,姚爱军1,董 磊2

李仁康,姚爱军,董磊.组合壳地下综合管廊关键节点力学性能试验研究[J].混凝土与水泥制品,2023(1):39-46.

LI R K,YAO A J,DONG L.Experimental Study on Mechanical Properties of Key Joints of Composite Shell Underground Utility Tunnel[J].China Concrete and Cement Products,2023(1):39-46.

浏览量:
1000
摘   要:为提高预制地下综合管廊的整体抗震性能,研发了新型组合壳地下综合管廊,并对8个足尺节点试件(4个组合壳管廊节点和4个现浇管廊节点试件)进行了低周反复荷载试验。研究结果表明:组合壳管廊节点和现浇管廊节点的破坏现象相似,L型节点的破坏模式为节点的弯剪破坏,T型节点的破坏模式为节点的弯曲破坏;组合壳管廊节点和现浇管廊节点的滞回曲线形状相似,L型节点的滞回曲线呈“弓形”,T型节点的滞回曲线呈“梭形”,T型节点较L型节点抗震性能优良;现浇管廊底部节点的承载力略高于组合壳管廊底部节点,组合壳管廊顶部节点的承载力略高于现浇管廊顶部节点;各节点的延性系数在3.09~14.76之间,各节点延性良好;组合壳管廊节点的耗能能力强于现浇管廊节点,T型节点的耗能能力强于L型节点;各节点刚度退化规律相似,现浇管廊节点的刚度略高于组合壳管廊节点的刚度。在此基础上,对组合壳管廊节点进行了安全性评价,并提出了相关结构优化措施。 Abstract: In order to improve the seismic performance of prefabricated underground utility tunnel, a new type of composite shell underground utility tunnel was developed, and low cyclic load tests were carried out on 8 full-size specimens, including 4 composite shell utility tunnels and 4 cast-in-place utility tunnels. The results show that the failure modes of the composite shell joints and the corresponding cast-in-place joints are similar. The failure mode of the L-shaped joint is bending-shear failure, and the failure mode of the T-shaped joint is bending failure. The shape of the hysteresis curves of the composite shell joints is similar to that of the corresponding cast-in-place joints. The hysteresis curves of the L-shaped joints are bow-shaped and those of the T-shaped joints are shuttle-shaped. The T-shaped joints have better seismic performance than the L-shaped joints. The bearing capacity of the joints at the bottom of the cast-in-place shell is slightly higher than that at the bottom of the composite shell, and the bearing capacity of the joints at the top of the composite shell is slightly higher than that at the top of the cast-in-place shell. The ductility coefficient of each joint is between 3.09 and 14.76, and the ductility of each joint is good. The energy dissipation capacity of the composite shell joint is stronger than that of the cast-in-place joint, and the energy dissipation capacity of the T-shaped joint is stronger than that of the L-shaped joint. The stiffness degradation of each joint is similar, and the stiffness of cast-in-place joint is slightly higher than that of composite shell joint. On this basis, the safety evaluation of composite shell joint is carried out and relevant structural optimization measures are put forward.
英文名 : Experimental Study on Mechanical Properties of Key Joints of Composite Shell Underground Utility Tunnel
刊期 : 2023年第1期
关键词 : 组合壳综合管廊;节点;低周反复荷载试验;抗震性能;延性;刚度;承载力
Key words : Composite shell unitily tunnel; Key joint; Low cycle repeated load test; Seismic performance; Ductility; Stiffness; Bearing capacity
刊期 : 2023年第1期
DOI : 10.19761/j.1000-4637.2023.01.039.08
文章编号 :
基金项目 :
作者 : 李仁康1,姚爱军1,董 磊2
单位 : 1.北京工业大学 城市建设学部,北京 100124;2.中铁建设集团有限公司,北京 100040

李仁康1,姚爱军1,董 磊2

李仁康,姚爱军,董磊.组合壳地下综合管廊关键节点力学性能试验研究[J].混凝土与水泥制品,2023(1):39-46.

LI R K,YAO A J,DONG L.Experimental Study on Mechanical Properties of Key Joints of Composite Shell Underground Utility Tunnel[J].China Concrete and Cement Products,2023(1):39-46.

摘要
参数
结论
参考文献
引用本文

摘   要:为提高预制地下综合管廊的整体抗震性能,研发了新型组合壳地下综合管廊,并对8个足尺节点试件(4个组合壳管廊节点和4个现浇管廊节点试件)进行了低周反复荷载试验。研究结果表明:组合壳管廊节点和现浇管廊节点的破坏现象相似,L型节点的破坏模式为节点的弯剪破坏,T型节点的破坏模式为节点的弯曲破坏;组合壳管廊节点和现浇管廊节点的滞回曲线形状相似,L型节点的滞回曲线呈“弓形”,T型节点的滞回曲线呈“梭形”,T型节点较L型节点抗震性能优良;现浇管廊底部节点的承载力略高于组合壳管廊底部节点,组合壳管廊顶部节点的承载力略高于现浇管廊顶部节点;各节点的延性系数在3.09~14.76之间,各节点延性良好;组合壳管廊节点的耗能能力强于现浇管廊节点,T型节点的耗能能力强于L型节点;各节点刚度退化规律相似,现浇管廊节点的刚度略高于组合壳管廊节点的刚度。在此基础上,对组合壳管廊节点进行了安全性评价,并提出了相关结构优化措施。

Abstract: In order to improve the seismic performance of prefabricated underground utility tunnel, a new type of composite shell underground utility tunnel was developed, and low cyclic load tests were carried out on 8 full-size specimens, including 4 composite shell utility tunnels and 4 cast-in-place utility tunnels. The results show that the failure modes of the composite shell joints and the corresponding cast-in-place joints are similar. The failure mode of the L-shaped joint is bending-shear failure, and the failure mode of the T-shaped joint is bending failure. The shape of the hysteresis curves of the composite shell joints is similar to that of the corresponding cast-in-place joints. The hysteresis curves of the L-shaped joints are bow-shaped and those of the T-shaped joints are shuttle-shaped. The T-shaped joints have better seismic performance than the L-shaped joints. The bearing capacity of the joints at the bottom of the cast-in-place shell is slightly higher than that at the bottom of the composite shell, and the bearing capacity of the joints at the top of the composite shell is slightly higher than that at the top of the cast-in-place shell. The ductility coefficient of each joint is between 3.09 and 14.76, and the ductility of each joint is good. The energy dissipation capacity of the composite shell joint is stronger than that of the cast-in-place joint, and the energy dissipation capacity of the T-shaped joint is stronger than that of the L-shaped joint. The stiffness degradation of each joint is similar, and the stiffness of cast-in-place joint is slightly higher than that of composite shell joint. On this basis, the safety evaluation of composite shell joint is carried out and relevant structural optimization measures are put forward.

扫二维码用手机看
未找到相应参数组,请于后台属性模板中添加

(1)组合壳管廊节点和相应现浇管廊节点的破坏现象相似,L型节点和T型节点的破坏现象不同,L型节点的破坏模式为节点的弯剪破坏和混凝土的受压破坏,T型节点的破坏模式为节点的弯曲破坏和混凝土的受压破坏。
(2)组合壳管廊节点和相应现浇管廊节点的滞回曲线形状相似,L型节点的滞回曲线呈“弓形”,曲线具有一定的“捏缩”现象,抗震性能和耗能较好,T型节点的滞回曲线呈“梭形”,曲线饱满,抗震性能和耗能优良,T型节点较L型节点抗震性能优良。
(3)现浇管廊底部节点的承载力略高于组合壳管廊底部节点,组合壳管廊顶部节点的承载力略高于现浇管廊顶部节点。各节点的延性系数在3.09~14.76,满足地下结构抗震延性系数大于3.00的要求,各节点延性良好。现浇L型节点的延性优于组合壳L型节点,组合壳T型节点的延性优于现浇T型节点,T型节点的延性优于L型节点的延性。
(4)组合壳管廊节点的耗能能力强于现浇管廊节点,T型节点的耗能能力强于L型节点,各节点刚度退化规律相似,现浇管廊节点的刚度略高于组合壳管廊节点的刚度。
(5)组合壳管廊节点具有较大的安全余量,满足设计要求,并对组合壳管廊节点提出了相应的设计建议。

[1] MARSHALL A M,HAJI T.An Analytical Study of Tunnel Pile Interaction[J].Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology,2015,45(1):43-51. 
[2] BENNETT R M,WOOD S M,DRUMM E C,et al.Vertical Loads on Concrete Box Culverts Under High Embankments[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering,2005,10(10):643-649.
[3] 田子玄.装配叠合式混凝土地下综合管廊受力性能试验研究[D].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学,2016.
[4] 郭福能.预制装配整体式混凝土综合管廊构件受力性能试验研究[D].长沙:湖南大学,2018. 
[5] 胡翔,白浩阳,薛伟辰,等.叠合板式综合管廊底部节点低周反复荷载试验[J].哈尔滨工程大学学报,2021,42(2):200-207.
[6] 魏奇科,王宇航,王永超,等.叠合装配式地下综合管廊节点抗震性能试验研究[J].建筑结构学报,2019,40(2):246-254.
[7] 庞瑞,王英彬,陈家豪,等.装配方式对矩形断面双舱地下综合管廊受力性能影响分析[J].工业建筑,2018,48(7):110-114.
[8] 王述红,贺宇,索善泽,等.预制装配式与现浇整体式综合管廊受力对比分析[J].混凝土与水泥制品,2018(9):36-38.
[9] 易伟建,颜良,彭真.无腋角综合管廊结构足尺模型静载试验与有限元分析[J].湖南大学学报(自然科学版),2019,46(7):1-10.
[10] 陈小文,王庆华,胡翔,等.叠合板式拼装综合管廊下部节点受力性能分析[J].施工技术,2018,47(12):130-134.
[11] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.建筑抗震试验规程: JGJ/T 101—2015[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2015.
[12] 丁嘉慧.新型插接装配式混凝土梁柱节点抗震性能研究[D].北京:中国矿业大学,2020.
[13] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.混凝土结构设计规范(2015年版):GB 50010—2010[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2010.
[14] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.建筑结构荷载规范:GB 50009—2012[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2012.
[15] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.装配式混凝土建筑技术标准:GB/T 51231—2016[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2016.
[16] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.城市综合管廊工程技术规范:GB 50838—2015[S].北京:中国计划出版社,2015.

李仁康,姚爱军,董磊.组合壳地下综合管廊关键节点力学性能试验研究[J].混凝土与水泥制品,2023(1):39-46.

LI R K,YAO A J,DONG L.Experimental Study on Mechanical Properties of Key Joints of Composite Shell Underground Utility Tunnel[J].China Concrete and Cement Products,2023(1):39-46.

相关文件

暂时没有内容信息显示
请先在网站后台添加数据记录。

关注《混凝土与水泥制品》

总访问量 468,401   网站统计

官方微信公众号关闭
苏州混凝土水泥制品研究院有限公司

关于我们    |    联系我们    |    订购杂志    |    回到顶部

版权所有:中国混凝土与水泥制品网  苏ICP备10086386号   网站建设:中企动力 苏州

版权所有:中国混凝土与水泥制品网

苏ICP备10086386号

网站建设:中企动力 苏州