结构修补用细石灌浆料高温后的性能研究_《混凝土与水泥制品》杂志社

头部文案

发布时间：2020-01-06 00:00:00

全国建材科技期刊
全国中文核心期刊
中国科技论文统计源期刊
万方数据-数字化期刊群入网期刊
中国学术期刊（光盘版）全文收录期刊

华东地区优秀科技期刊
江苏省期刊方阵“双效期刊”
中国期刊网全文收录期刊
中国科技期刊数据库全文收录期刊



结构修补用细石灌浆料高温后的性能研究

Study on performance of fine stone grouting material for structural repair after high temperature

2023年第5期

高温；细石灌浆料；质量损失；强度损失；冷却方式

High temperature; Fine stone grouting material; Mass loss; Strength loss; Cooling method

2023年第5期

10.19761/j.1000-4637.2023.08.026.06

王松岩，赵健，焦红*

山东建筑大学土木工程学院，山东济南 250101

王松岩，赵健，焦红*

王松岩,赵健,焦红.结构修补用细石灌浆料高温后的性能研究[J].混凝土与水泥制品,2023(8):26-30,36.

WANG S Y,ZHAO J,JIAO H.Study on performance of fine stone grouting material for structural repair after high temperature [J].China Concrete and Cement Products,2023(8):26-30,36.

浏览量:

1000

摘要：为了研究结构修补用细石灌浆料高温后的性能，试验分析了不同温度（200、400、600、800、1 000 ℃）、不同冷却方式（自然冷却、浸水冷却）对细石灌浆料表观状态变化、质量损失、强度损失的影响规律，建立了温度与质量损失、温度与残余抗压强度的函数关系式。结果表明：在200~1 000 ℃高温后，试件的颜色由灰色变至黄白色，温度越高，试件表面裂纹越严重；温度的升高以及高温持续时间的延长会导致试件质量损失以及强度损失的加剧；当温度为200 ℃时，两种冷却方式的抗压强度基本一致，升高至400 ℃及以上时，自然冷却试件的抗压强度高于浸水冷却；基于试验数据建立的拟合关系式的拟合效果较好。 Abstract: In order to study the performance of fine stone grouting material for structural repair after high temperature, the influence of different temperatures(200、400、600、800、1 000 ℃) and cooling methods (free cooling, immersion cooling) on the apparent state change, mass loss and strength loss of fine stone grouting material was discussed, and the functional relationships between temperature and mass loss, temperature and residual compressive strength were established. The results show that after experiencing temperatures ranging from 200 ℃ to 1 000 ℃, the color of the specimen changes from gray to yellow white, and the higher the temperature, the more severe the surface cracks on the specimen. The increase in temperature and the prolongation of high temperature duration can lead to an intensification of the loss of specimen mass and strength. At 200 ℃, the compressive strength of the two cooling methods is basically the same. At 400 ℃ and above, the compressive strength of the free cooling specimen is higher than that of the immersion cooling specimen. The fitting relationship established based on experimental datas has a good degree of fitting.

英文名 : Study on performance of fine stone grouting material for structural repair after high temperature

刊期 : 2023年第5期

关键词 : 高温；细石灌浆料；质量损失；强度损失；冷却方式

Key words : High temperature; Fine stone grouting material; Mass loss; Strength loss; Cooling method

刊期 : 2023年第5期

DOI : 10.19761/j.1000-4637.2023.08.026.06

文章编号 :

基金项目 :

作者 : 王松岩，赵健，焦红*

单位 : 山东建筑大学土木工程学院，山东济南 250101

王松岩，赵健，焦红*

王松岩,赵健,焦红.结构修补用细石灌浆料高温后的性能研究[J].混凝土与水泥制品,2023(8):26-30,36.

WANG S Y,ZHAO J,JIAO H.Study on performance of fine stone grouting material for structural repair after high temperature [J].China Concrete and Cement Products,2023(8):26-30,36.





摘要

参数

结论

参考文献

引用本文

Abstract: In order to study the performance of fine stone grouting material for structural repair after high temperature, the influence of different temperatures(200、400、600、800、1 000 ℃) and cooling methods (free cooling, immersion cooling) on the apparent state change, mass loss and strength loss of fine stone grouting material was discussed, and the functional relationships between temperature and mass loss, temperature and residual compressive strength were established. The results show that after experiencing temperatures ranging from 200 ℃ to 1 000 ℃, the color of the specimen changes from gray to yellow white, and the higher the temperature, the more severe the surface cracks on the specimen. The increase in temperature and the prolongation of high temperature duration can lead to an intensification of the loss of specimen mass and strength. At 200 ℃, the compressive strength of the two cooling methods is basically the same. At 400 ℃ and above, the compressive strength of the free cooling specimen is higher than that of the immersion cooling specimen. The fitting relationship established based on experimental datas has a good degree of fitting.

扫二维码用手机看

[1] 黄建锋,朱春明,龚治国,等.增大截面法加固震损钢筋混凝土框架的抗震性能试验研究[J].土木工程学报,2012,45(12):9-17.
[2] PERRET S,KHAYAT K H,GAGNON E,et al.Repair of 130-year old masonry bridge using high-performance cement grout[J].Journal of Bridge Engineering,2002,7(1):31-38.
[3] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.水泥基灌浆材料应用技术规范:GB/T 50448—2015[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2015.

[4] 吴元,李延和,李树林.豆石型灌浆料的工作及力学性能试验研究[J].工业建筑,2008(6):82-85,91.
[5] 蒋涛,廖开星,潘从玲,等.高性能水泥基灌浆料的制备及研究[J].混凝土与水泥制品,2021(12):6-11.
[6] 杨倩,贾恒瑞,陈宗平.火灾高温后混凝土剩余强度及本构方程研究[J].混凝土与水泥制品,2022(3):28-33.
[7] 徐海源,沙建芳,张亚梅,等.拱桥加固用细石灌浆料的配制与施工关键技术研究[J].施工技术,2019,48(增刊1):1120-1123.
[8] 商兴艳,陆洲导.冷却方式对高温后ECC力学性能的影响[J].湖南大学学报(自然科学版),2015,42(7):81-86.
[9] 余志武,资伟,匡亚川,等.受热温度和时间对混凝土抗压强度的影响[J].消防科学与技术,2012,31(2):111-114.
[10] 张白,陈俊,杨鸥,等.高温后混凝土质量损失及抗压强度退化规律试验研究[J].建筑结构,2019,49(4):76-81.
[11] 万胜武,许鹏,徐杰,等.火灾高温后混凝土残余强度的试验研究[J].科学技术与工程,2018,18(6):316-320.
[12] 陈正发,刘桂凤,秦彦龙,等.恶劣环境下机制砂混凝土的强度和耐久性能[J].建筑材料学报,2012,15(3):391-394.
[13] 杨婷,刘中宪,杨烨凯,等.超高性能混凝土高温后性能试验研究[J].土木与环境工程学报(中英文),2020,42(3):115-126.
[14] 钱云峰,杨鼎宜,夏旸昊,等.纤维对含粗骨料超高性能混凝土高温性能的影响[J].混凝土与水泥制品,2021(2):51-56.
[15] 罗小宝,刘真.硅粉对混凝土高温后力学性能影响的试验研究[J].建筑结构,2021,51(9):70-73,22.
[16] 谢开仲,刘振威,朱茂金,等.不同石粉含量的机制砂混凝土高温后力学性能[J].建筑科学与工程学报,2021,38(3):80-89.
[17] 王宏,王丹丹,朱平,等.胶砂比对UHPC高温力学性能及微观结构的影响[J].混凝土与水泥制品,2022(7):14-19.
[18] 邹宇驰,毛小勇.高温下灌浆料抗压力学性能试验研究[J].苏州科技大学学报(工程技术版),2021,34(2):1-6.
[19] 王磊.纳米SiO2和PVA纤维增强水泥基复合材料高温后力学性能研究[D].郑州:郑州大学,2021.
[20] 苗生龙,李庆涛,赵园园,等.高温后纳米SiO2混凝土力学性能试验研究[J].应用基础与工程科学学报,2021,29(4):999-1006.

上一个

不同大气温湿条件下混凝土湿度响应试验研究

下一个

不同产地机制砂对UHPC性能的影响

头部文案

结构修补用细石灌浆料高温后的性能研究

相关文件