再生混凝土全生命周期碳化的CO2排放评价_《混凝土与水泥制品》杂志社

头部文案

发布时间：2020-01-06 00:00:00

全国建材科技期刊
全国中文核心期刊
中国科技论文统计源期刊
万方数据-数字化期刊群入网期刊
中国学术期刊（光盘版）全文收录期刊

华东地区优秀科技期刊
江苏省期刊方阵“双效期刊”
中国期刊网全文收录期刊
中国科技期刊数据库全文收录期刊



再生混凝土全生命周期碳化的CO2排放评价

CO2 emission evaluation of full life cycle carbonization of recycled concrete

2023年第11期

再生混凝土；再生粗骨料；CO2排放；固碳方式；生命周期评价；环境价值

Recycled concrete; Recycled coarse aggregate; CO2 emission; Carbon sequestration method; Life cycle assessment(LCA); Environmental value

2023年第11期

10.19761/j.1000-4637.2023.11.082.06

国家自然科学基金项目（51968046）；江西省主要学科学术和技术带头人培养计划——领军人才项目（20204BCJ22003）。

雷斌，杨婉莹，余林杰，晏育松*

南昌大学工程建设学院，江西南昌 330031

雷斌，杨婉莹，余林杰，晏育松*

雷斌,杨婉莹,余林杰,等.再生混凝土全生命周期碳化的CO2排放评价[J].混凝土与水泥制品,2023(11):82-87.

LEI B,YANG W Y,YU L J,et al.CO2 emission evaluation of full life cycle carbonization of recycled concrete[J].China Concrete and Cement Products,2023(11):82-87.

浏览量:

1000

摘要：为了减少再生混凝土全生命周期CO2排放量，考虑再生混凝土服役阶段的碳化作用，采用碳化再生粗骨料、CO2环境下搅拌和养护的固碳方式对再生混凝土全生命周期进行碳化设计。运用生命周期评价（LCA）理论，将再生混凝土生命周期分为6个阶段，分别为原材料生产和运输、再生混凝土的生产、运输、施工、服役、拆除，并建立了各阶段CO2排放计算模型，探究了1 m3的C30再生混凝土全生命周期CO2排放量。此外，对再生混凝土全生命周期CO2排放的环境影响进行了评价。结果表明：与仅服役阶段碳化作用下的再生混凝土全生命周期CO2排放量（APL）相比，再生混凝土全生命周期碳化作用下的CO2排放量（BPL）减少；与再生粗骨料固碳相比，再生混凝土搅拌和养护固碳对降低再生混凝土全生命周期CO2排放的作用更好；用再生粗骨料取代部分天然粗骨料可以节约环境成本，减少CO2排放量，具有显著的环境价值和经济价值。 Abstract: In order to reduce the full life cycle CO2 emission of recycled concrete, the carbonization effect during the service stage of recycled concrete was considered, and the carbonization design of the full life cycle of recycled concrete was carried out by using carbonized recycled coarse aggregates, mixing and curing in CO2 environment. Using the theory of life cycle assessment(LCA), the life cycle of recycled concrete was divided into six stages, namely raw material production and transportation, production, transportation, construction, service and demolition of recycled concrete. The CO2 emission calculation models for each stage were established, and the CO2 emission during the full life cycle of 1 m3 of C30 recycled concrete were explored. In addition, the environmental impact of CO2 emission during the full life cycle of recycled concrete was evaluated. The results show that compared with the full life cycle CO2 emission (APL) of recycled concrete under carbonization during the service stage only, the CO2 emissions (BPL) of recycled concrete under full life cycle carbonization are reduced. Compared with the carbon sequestration of recycled coarse aggregates, the mixing and curing of recycled concrete have a better effect on reducing CO2 emission during the full life cycle of recycled concrete. Replacing some natural coarse aggregates with recycled coarse aggregates can save environmental costs, reduce CO2 emission, which has significant environmental and economic value.

英文名 : CO2 emission evaluation of full life cycle carbonization of recycled concrete

刊期 : 2023年第11期

关键词 : 再生混凝土；再生粗骨料；CO2排放；固碳方式；生命周期评价；环境价值

Key words : Recycled concrete; Recycled coarse aggregate; CO2 emission; Carbon sequestration method; Life cycle assessment(LCA); Environmental value

刊期 : 2023年第11期

DOI : 10.19761/j.1000-4637.2023.11.082.06

文章编号 :

基金项目 : 国家自然科学基金项目（51968046）；江西省主要学科学术和技术带头人培养计划——领军人才项目（20204BCJ22003）。

作者 : 雷斌，杨婉莹，余林杰，晏育松*

单位 : 南昌大学工程建设学院，江西南昌 330031

雷斌，杨婉莹，余林杰，晏育松*

雷斌,杨婉莹,余林杰,等.再生混凝土全生命周期碳化的CO2排放评价[J].混凝土与水泥制品,2023(11):82-87.

LEI B,YANG W Y,YU L J,et al.CO2 emission evaluation of full life cycle carbonization of recycled concrete[J].China Concrete and Cement Products,2023(11):82-87.





摘要

参数

结论

参考文献

引用本文

摘要：为了减少再生混凝土全生命周期CO2排放量，考虑再生混凝土服役阶段的碳化作用，采用碳化再生粗骨料、CO₂环境下搅拌和养护的固碳方式对再生混凝土全生命周期进行碳化设计。运用生命周期评价（LCA）理论，将再生混凝土生命周期分为6个阶段，分别为原材料生产和运输、再生混凝土的生产、运输、施工、服役、拆除，并建立了各阶段CO₂排放计算模型，探究了1 m³的C30再生混凝土全生命周期CO₂排放量。此外，对再生混凝土全生命周期CO₂排放的环境影响进行了评价。结果表明：与仅服役阶段碳化作用下的再生混凝土全生命周期CO₂排放量（APL）相比，再生混凝土全生命周期碳化作用下的CO₂排放量（BPL）减少；与再生粗骨料固碳相比，再生混凝土搅拌和养护固碳对降低再生混凝土全生命周期CO2排放的作用更好；用再生粗骨料取代部分天然粗骨料可以节约环境成本，减少CO₂排放量，具有显著的环境价值和经济价值。

Abstract: In order to reduce the full life cycle CO₂ emission of recycled concrete, the carbonization effect during the service stage of recycled concrete was considered, and the carbonization design of the full life cycle of recycled concrete was carried out by using carbonized recycled coarse aggregates, mixing and curing in CO₂ environment. Using the theory of life cycle assessment(LCA), the life cycle of recycled concrete was divided into six stages, namely raw material production and transportation, production, transportation, construction, service and demolition of recycled concrete. The CO₂ emission calculation models for each stage were established, and the CO₂ emission during the full life cycle of 1 m³ of C30 recycled concrete were explored. In addition, the environmental impact of CO₂ emission during the full life cycle of recycled concrete was evaluated. The results show that compared with the full life cycle CO₂ emission (APL) of recycled concrete under carbonization during the service stage only, the CO₂ emissions (BPL) of recycled concrete under full life cycle carbonization are reduced. Compared with the carbon sequestration of recycled coarse aggregates, the mixing and curing of recycled concrete have a better effect on reducing CO₂ emission during the full life cycle of recycled concrete. Replacing some natural coarse aggregates with recycled coarse aggregates can save environmental costs, reduce CO₂ emission, which has significant environmental and economic value.

扫二维码用手机看

[1] 高唱.基于LCA的再生混凝土环境影响评价研究[D].北京:北京建筑大学,2020.
[2] 肖宇,吴水根,肖建庄,等.绿色混凝土的碳排放分析[J].建筑施工,2019,41(2):312-317.
[3] 徐金俊,乌忱昊,王浩,等.再生混凝土绿色建筑碳排放评价及灰色参数敏感性分析[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版),2020,52(3):396-403.
[4] 孙永乐.建筑生命周期碳排放计算模型[J].山东英才学院学报,2018(2):60-64.
[5] ZHANG Y R,LUO W,WANG J J,et al.A review of life cycle assessment of recycled aggregate concrete[J].Construction and Building Materials,2019,209:115-125.
[6] PADE C,GUIMARAES M.The CO2 uptake of concrete in a 100 year perspective[J].Cement and Concrete Research,2007,37(9):1348-1356.
[7] KIKUCHI T,KURODA Y.Carbon dioxide uptake in demolished and crushed concrete[J].Journal of advanced concrete technology,2011,9(1):115-124.
[8] COLLINS F.Inclusion of carbonation during the life cycle of built and recycled concrete: influence on their carbon footprint[J].International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment,2010,15(6):549-556.
[9] 肖建庄,黎骜,丁陶.再生混凝土生命周期CO2排放评价[J].东南大学学报(自然科学版),2016,46(5):1088-1092.
[10] International Standards Organization.Environmental management-Life cycle assessment-Principles and framework:ISO/DIS 14040[S].Paris:European Committee for Standardisation,2006.
[11] MARINKOVIC S,RADONJANIN V,MALVSEV M,et al.Comparative environmental assessment of natural and recycled aggregate concrete[J].Waste Management,2010,30(11):2255-2264.
[12] WU P,XIA B,ZHAO X B.The importance of use and end-of-life phases to the life cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of concrete-A review[J].Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,2014,37:360-369.
[13] 章玉容,徐雅琴,姚泽阳,等.配合比设计方法对再生混凝土生命周期评价的影响[J].浙江工业大学学报,2020,48(6):648-653.
[14] 李小冬,王帅,孔祥勤,等.预拌混凝土生命周期环境影响评价[J].土木工程学报,2011,44(1):132-138.
[15] 李春晖.复掺矿物掺合料混凝土碳化性能研究[D].西安:西安建筑科技大学,2009.
[16] GONG X Z,NIE Z R,WANG Z H,et al.Life cycle energy consumption and carbon dioxide emission of residential building designs in Beijing[J].Journal of Industrial Ecology,2012,16(4):576-587.
[17] 高越青,潘碧豪,梁超锋,等.CO2强化再生骨料的特性及其对再生混凝土性能的影响[J].土木与环境工程学报(中英文),2021,43(6):95-102.
[18] JUAN M S D,GUTIERREZ P A.Study on the influence of attached mortar content on the properties of recycled concrete aggregate[J].Construction and Building Materials,2009,23(2):872-877.
[19] HE Z,LI Z,Shao Y X.Effect of carbonation mixing on CO2 uptake and strength gain in concrete[J].Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering,2017,29(10):04017176.
[20] 唐薇.再生混凝土骨料固碳关键技术的研究[D].深圳:深圳大学,2019.
[21] ZHANG Y R,LIU M H,XIE H B,et al.Assessment of CO2 emissions and cost in fly ash concrete[EB/OL].(2015-08-27)[2022-10-15].https://www.researchgate.net/publication/
280430859.
[22] LEE S H,PARK W J,LEE H S.Life cycle CO2 assessment method for concrete using CO2 balance and suggestion to decrease LCCO2 of concrete in South-Korean apartment[J].Energy and Buildings,2013,58:93-102.
[23] 肖建庄,雷斌.再生混凝土碳化模型与结构耐久性设计[J].建筑科学与工程学报,2008,25(3):66-72.
[24] PU Y H,LI L,WANG Q Y,et al.Accelerated carbonation technology for enhanced treatment of recycled concrete aggregates: A state-of-the-art review[J].Construction and Building Materials,2021,282:122671.
[25] 万惠文,水中和,林宗寿,等.再生混凝土的环境评价[J].武汉理工大学学报,2003(4):17-20,23.
[26] 龚志起,丁锐,陈柏昆.废弃混凝土处理方式的环境影响比较[J].工程管理学报,2011,25(3):266-270.
[27] LIU M H,ZHANG Y R,WANG Y F.Influence of environment conditions on carbon emission of fly ash concrete[J].Materials Research Innovations,2016,19:216-219.
[28] 李小冬,吴星,张智慧.基于LCA理论的环境影响社会支付意愿研究[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报,2005(11):1507-1510.

上一个

高钛矿渣UHPC浆体的制备及性能研究

下一个

机械-化学耦合激发电解锰渣对水泥基材料性能的影响

头部文案

再生混凝土全生命周期碳化的CO2排放评价

相关文件