基于全生命周期评价的掺石灰石粉再生混凝土环境影响研究

头部文案

发布时间：2020-01-06 00:00:00

全国建材科技期刊
全国中文核心期刊
中国科技论文统计源期刊
万方数据-数字化期刊群入网期刊
中国学术期刊（光盘版）全文收录期刊

华东地区优秀科技期刊
江苏省期刊方阵“双效期刊”
中国期刊网全文收录期刊
中国科技期刊数据库全文收录期刊



基于全生命周期评价的掺石灰石粉再生混凝土环境影响研究

Study on environmental impact of recycled concrete with limestone powder based on whole life cycle assessment

2023年第12期

石灰石粉；再生混凝土；生命周期评价；环境影响

Limestone powder; Recycled concrete; Life cycle assessment(LCA); Environmental impact

2023年第12期

10.19761/j.1000-4637.2023.12.079.05

国家重点研发计划项目（2021YFB3802001）。

李刚，郭晓潞，佘安明*

同济大学材料科学与工程学院先进土木工程材料教育部重点实验室，上海 201804

李刚，郭晓潞，佘安明*

李刚,郭晓潞,佘安明.基于全生命周期评价的掺石灰石粉再生混凝土环境影响研究[J].混凝土与水泥制品,2023(12):79-82,88.

LI G,GUO X L,SHE A M.Study on environmental impact of recycled concrete with limestone powder based on whole life cycle assessment[J].China Concrete and Cement Products,2023(12):79-82,88.

浏览量:

1000

摘要：用石灰石粉部分取代水泥制备了再生混凝土（LP-RAC），并基于生命周期评价（LCA）方法，通过计算LP-RAC全生命周期（生产阶段、使用阶段、废弃阶段）产生的9种污染气体量（CO2、CO、NOx、SO2、CH4、N2O、NH3、PM10、NMVOC）及其对6种环境影响类型[气候变化潜值（GWP）、环境酸化潜值（AP）、非生物资源消耗潜值（ADP）、富营养化潜值（EP）、可吸入无机物（RI）、光化学臭氧合成潜值（POFP）]的“贡献率”，评价了LP-RAC全生命周期的环境影响。结果表明：LP-RAC的生产阶段对6种环境影响类型的“贡献率”均最大；在LP-RAC的生产阶段，水泥生产环节对GWP和RI的“贡献率”最大，直接排放环节对AP、EP和POFP的“贡献率”最大，河砂开采环节对ADP的“贡献率”最大。 Abstract: The recycled concrete(LP-RAC) was prepared by replacing some cement with limestone powder. Based on the life cycle assessment(LCA) method, the environmental impact of the whole life cycle(production stage, utilization stage, disposal stage) of LP-RAC was evaluated by calculating the amount of 9 types of polluting gases (CO2、CO、NOx、SO2、CH4、N2O、NH3、PM10、NMVOC) and their "contribution rate" to 6 types of environmental impact [global warming potential(GWP), acidification potential(AP), abiotic depletion potential(ADP), eutrophication potential(EP), respirable inorganic material(RI), photochemical ozone formation potential(POFP)]. The results show that the production stage of LP-RAC has the highest "contribution rate" to the 6 types of environmental impact. In the production stage of LP-RAC, the cement production process has the highest "contribution rate" to GWP and RI, the direct emission process has the highest "contribution rate" to AP, EP and POFP, and the river sand mining process has the highest "contribution rate" to ADP.

英文名 : Study on environmental impact of recycled concrete with limestone powder based on whole life cycle assessment

刊期 : 2023年第12期

关键词 : 石灰石粉；再生混凝土；生命周期评价；环境影响

Key words : Limestone powder; Recycled concrete; Life cycle assessment(LCA); Environmental impact

刊期 : 2023年第12期

DOI : 10.19761/j.1000-4637.2023.12.079.05

文章编号 :

基金项目 : 国家重点研发计划项目（2021YFB3802001）。

作者 : 李刚，郭晓潞，佘安明*

单位 : 同济大学材料科学与工程学院先进土木工程材料教育部重点实验室，上海 201804

李刚，郭晓潞，佘安明*

李刚,郭晓潞,佘安明.基于全生命周期评价的掺石灰石粉再生混凝土环境影响研究[J].混凝土与水泥制品,2023(12):79-82,88.

LI G,GUO X L,SHE A M.Study on environmental impact of recycled concrete with limestone powder based on whole life cycle assessment[J].China Concrete and Cement Products,2023(12):79-82,88.





摘要

参数

结论

参考文献

引用本文

摘要：用石灰石粉部分取代水泥制备了再生混凝土（LP-RAC），并基于生命周期评价（LCA）方法，通过计算LP-RAC全生命周期（生产阶段、使用阶段、废弃阶段）产生的9种污染气体量（CO₂、CO、NO_x、SO₂、CH₄、N₂O、NH₃、PM10、NMVOC）及其对6种环境影响类型[气候变化潜值（GWP）、环境酸化潜值（AP）、非生物资源消耗潜值（ADP）、富营养化潜值（EP）、可吸入无机物（RI）、光化学臭氧合成潜值（POFP）]的“贡献率”，评价了LP-RAC全生命周期的环境影响。结果表明：LP-RAC的生产阶段对6种环境影响类型的“贡献率”均最大；在LP-RAC的生产阶段，水泥生产环节对GWP和RI的“贡献率”最大，直接排放环节对AP、EP和POFP的“贡献率”最大，河砂开采环节对ADP的“贡献率”最大。

Abstract: The recycled concrete(LP-RAC) was prepared by replacing some cement with limestone powder. Based on the life cycle assessment(LCA) method, the environmental impact of the whole life cycle(production stage, utilization stage, disposal stage) of LP-RAC was evaluated by calculating the amount of 9 types of polluting gases (CO₂、CO、NO_x、SO₂、CH₄、N₂O、NH₃、PM10、NMVOC) and their "contribution rate" to 6 types of environmental impact [global warming potential(GWP), acidification potential(AP), abiotic depletion potential(ADP), eutrophication potential(EP), respirable inorganic material(RI), photochemical ozone formation potential(POFP)]. The results show that the production stage of LP-RAC has the highest "contribution rate" to the 6 types of environmental impact. In the production stage of LP-RAC, the cement production process has the highest "contribution rate" to GWP and RI, the direct emission process has the highest "contribution rate" to AP, EP and POFP, and the river sand mining process has the highest "contribution rate" to ADP.

扫二维码用手机看

[1] 张小丹,张彦栋.对低品位石灰石的开采利用[J].建材技术与应用,2011(8):22-23.
[2] 何彦琪,蒋震,陈凯,等.石灰石粉对水泥水化及C-S-H成核的动力学影响[J].硅酸盐通报,2018,37(8):2531-2535.
[3] 李涛,金磊,申瑞娟,等.低品位石灰石粉与粉煤灰复掺效应对C50海工混凝土抗Cl-迁移的影响[J].混凝土与水泥制品,2020(1):21-23.
[4] 赵凯月,董振平,张金团,等.石灰石粉在混凝土中的应用现状[J].混凝土,2018(10):143-147.
[5] JIAN S M,WU B,HU N.Environmental impacts of three waste concrete recycling strategies for prefabricated components through comparative life cycle assessment[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2021,328:129463.
[6] ABED M,FORT J,RASHID K.Multicriterial life cycle assessment of eco-efficient self-compacting concrete modified by waste perlite powder and/or recycled concrete aggregate[J].Construction and Building Materials,2022,348:128696.
[7] XING W Q,TAM V W Y,LE K N,et al.Effects of mix design and functional unit on life cycle assessment of recycled aggregate concrete: Evidence from CO2 concrete[J].Construction and Building Materials,2022,348:128712.
[8] 李承明,孔祥坤,熊宇强,等.基于生命周期理论的再生混凝土空心砌块环境性能评价[J].新型建筑材料,2021,48(1):112-115.
[9] SANDANAYAKE M,BOURAS Y,VRCELJ Z.A feasibility study of using coffee cup waste as a building material-Life cycle assessment and multi-objective optimisation[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2022,339:130498.

[10] 徐金俊,乌忱昊,王浩,等.再生混凝土绿色建筑碳排放评价及灰色参数敏感性分析[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版),2020,52(3):396-403.
[11] 郝亚利,丁扬飞,姚武,等.废弃石粉制备高强再生混凝土的研究[J].新型建筑材料,2023(1):8-11,40
[12] SHI X J,MUKHOPADHYAY A,ZOLLINGER D,et al.Economic input-output life cycle assessment of concrete pavement containing recycled concrete aggregate[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2019,225:414-425.
[13] VASCO S R,JORGE D B,KUMAR D R.Establishing a relationship between modulus of elasticity and compressive strength of recycled aggregate concrete[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2016,112:2171-2186.
[14] 肖建庄,黎骜,丁陶.再生混凝土生命周期CO2排放评价[J].东南大学学报(自然科学版),2016,46(5):1088-1092.
[15] VISINTIN P,DADD L,UL-ALAM M,et al.Flexural performance and life-cycle assessment of multi-generation recycled aggregate concrete beams[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2022,360:132214.
[16] GUO Z G,TU A,CHEN C,et al.Mechanical properties, durability, and life-cycle assessment of concrete building blocks incorporating recycled concrete aggregates[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2018,199:136-149.
[17] AKHTAR A,SARMAH A K.Construction and demolition waste generation and properties of recycled aggregate concrete: A global perspective[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2018,186:262-281.
[18] 章玉容,徐雅琴,姚泽阳,等.配合比设计方法对再生混凝土生命周期评价的影响[J].浙江工业大学学报,2020,48(6):648-653.

上一个

无

下一个

固废基建筑3D打印材料的制备及性能研究

头部文案

基于全生命周期评价的掺石灰石粉再生混凝土环境影响研究

相关文件