憎水剂对超轻发泡混凝土性能的影响研究

Affecting Research of Water Repellent on Properties of Ultra-lightweight Foamed Concrete

浏览量:

关键词:

超轻发泡混凝土;憎水剂;孔结构;抗压强度; 体积吸水率

Key words:

Ultra-lightweight foamed concrete; Water repellent; Pore structure; Compressive strength; Volume water absorption

刊期:

2016年第3期

DOI:

文章编号:

1000-4637(2016)03-71-04

基金项目:

作者:

何顺爱1,朱晓燕2

单位:

1.四川华西绿舍建材有限公司,成都 610081;2.西南科技大学,绵阳 620024

摘要

摘   要:以普通硅酸盐水泥与硫铝酸盐水泥为胶凝材料,采用物理发泡工艺制备了干密度小于300kg/m3的发泡混凝土,研究了三种憎水剂对发泡混凝土抗压强度、体积吸水率及孔结构的影响。研究表明:憎水剂掺量增加,试样7d及28d抗压强度先增加后降低,憎水剂硬脂酸钙相对于苯丙乳液及有机硅,对试样干密度及气孔结构影响最小,体积吸水率降低最为明显;当硬脂酸钙掺量为2.5%时,干密度为274.1kg/m3的试样28d抗压强度为0.65MPa,体积吸水率为8.6%。

Abstract: For ordinary Portland cement and sulphoaluminate cement as cementitious materials, foamed concrete for dry density less than 300kg/m3 is prepared by physical foaming process, the influence of three kinds of water repellents on compressive strength, volume water absorption and pore structure is investigated. The results indicate that, with the increasing dosage of water repellent, the compressive strength of samples with 7 days and 28 days is increased at first then decreased, compared with styrene-acrylate emulsion and organic silicon, the effect of calcium stearate on dry density and pore structure of samples is the least, and volume water absorption is decreased significantly. When the dosage of calcium stearate is 2.5%, the dry density of sample is 274.1kg/m3, the compressive strength in 28 days achieves 0.65MPa and the volume water absorption is 8.6%.

结论

(1)以硫铝酸盐水泥取代15%的普通硅酸盐水泥,并采用物理发泡工艺,可制备干密度275. 2kg/m3,28d抗压强度0.56MPa的超轻发泡混凝土。
(2)憎水剂从0增加至3.75%,超轻发泡混凝土7d及28d抗压强度先增加后降低,体积吸水率下降,但憎水剂硬脂酸钙相对于苯丙乳液和有机硅对超轻发泡混凝土气孔结构及干密度影响程度小,并且能够大幅度降低超轻发泡混凝土的体积吸水率。当硬脂酸钙掺量为2.5%,硫铝酸盐水泥取代15%的普通硅酸盐水泥可制备出干密度为274.1kg/m3, 28d抗压强度为0.65MPa,体积吸水率为8.6%的超轻发泡混凝土。

参考文献

[1] F.K. Akthar, J.R.G.Evans. High porosity(>90%) cementitious foams [J]. Cement and Concrete Research 2010,40:352-358.
[2] 邱军付,罗淑湘,鲁虹,等. 普通硅酸盐水泥超轻泡沫混凝土的试验研究[J].混凝土,2014(1):38-40.
[3] Ramamurthy K, Kunhanandan E K, Nambiar G, et al. A classification of studies on properties of foam concrete[J].Cement and Concrete Composites, 2009(6):388-396.
[4] T.D.Tonyan,L.J.Gibson. Structure and mechanics of cement foams[J]. JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE,1992,27:6371-6378.
[5] 蒋俊,卢忠远,牛云辉. 减水剂对物理法超轻泡沫混凝土气孔结构及性能的影响研究[J].武汉理工大学学报,2014(11):25-31.
[6] She Wei, Chen Yiqiang, Zhang Yunsheng, et al. Characterization and simulation of microstructure and thermal properties of foamed concrete[J].Construction and Building Materials,2013, 47:1278-1291.
[7] 黄政宇,孙庆丰,周志敏.硅酸盐-硫铝酸盐水泥超轻泡沫混凝土孔结构及性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报,2013,32:1894-1899.
[8] 李恒志,潘志华. 超低密度泡沫混凝土耐水性能改善的研究[J].混凝土,2014(6):88-91.
[9] 胡君. 有机硅憎水剂对发泡水泥复合保温板性能的影响[J]. 四川建材,2014(5):29-30,32.
[10] GUO Kai, HU Shu-guang, Ding Qing-jun.The simplified method of analyse macro pore feature of aerated concrete and its validation[J].Journal of Functional Materials, 2012, 20:2855-2857,2862.
[11] 李和欣. 氮化硅颗粒稳定泡沫陶瓷的研究[D].北京:清华大学,2012. 
[12]刘骞. 短链两亲分子及表面活性剂与亲水颗粒协同稳定的泡沫[D].济南:山东大学,2010.
 

引用本文


上一个: JG/T 477—2015《混凝土塑性阶段水分蒸发抑制剂》标准解读

下一个: 新型节能承重砌块砌体抗剪强度试验研究

相关文件