RPC电缆沟盖板承载能力试验方法研究
Study on Test Method of Bearing Capacity of RPC(Reactive Powder Concrete) Electric Cover
关键词:
活性粉末混凝土;电缆沟盖板;承载能力试验方法
Key words:
Reactive Powder Concrete (RPC);Electric cover;Bearing capacity test method
刊期:
DOI:
文章编号:
1000-4637(2016)08-30-03
基金项目:
华南理工大学亚热带建筑科学国家重点实验室自主研究课题项目(2016KB14)
作者:
杨医博1,2,冼剑华1,刘福财3,潘文智1,黄鸿浩1,蔡铉烨1,郭文瑛1,王恒昌1,肖 敏3
单位:
1.华南理工大学土木与交通学院,广州 510640;2.华南理工大学亚热带建筑科学 国家重点实验室,广州 510640;3.广东盖特奇新材料科技有限公司,清远 511500
摘要
摘 要:对三种不同规格的RPC盖板分别用GB 26537—2011《钢纤维混凝土检查井盖》附录B和南方电网《电缆沟盖板标准技术标书》中规定的承载能力试验方法进行了测试并对比分析。结果表明:采用GB 26537—2011方法测得的盖板裂缝荷载和破坏荷载均高于电力行业方法所测结果,但国标方法测试时盖板内部钢筋不屈服,且在加载后期盖板的受力状态与实际不符,因此,建议采用电力行业方法作为活性粉末混凝土电缆沟盖板承载能力测试方法。
Abstract: The three different sizes of Reactive Powder Concrete cover using the bearing capacity test methods referred to the appendix B of GB 26537—2011 steel fiber reinforced concrete manhole cover and standard technical tender of electric cover of the China Southern power grid are tested and compared respectively. The test results indicate that the crack load and the ultimate load tested by the national standard method are greater than those of the occupation standard method. Furthermore, the steel bar inside the cover doesn’t yield when tested by the national standard method and the loading condition is not correspond with the fact during the later loading period. Therefore, it’s recommended that the bearing capacity of the Reactive Powder Concrete cover should be tested by the occupation standard method.
结论
参考文献
引用本文
相关文件