苏州混凝土水泥制品研究院有限公司

头部文案

发布时间:2020-01-06 00:00:00
全国建材科技期刊
全国中文核心期刊
中国科技论文统计源期刊
万方数据-数字化期刊群入网期刊
中国学术期刊(光盘版)全文收录期刊
华东地区优秀科技期刊
江苏省期刊方阵“双效期刊”
中国期刊网全文收录期刊
中国科技期刊数据库全文收录期刊
界面处理对硫铝酸盐水泥修补砂浆黏结性能的影响
Influence of interface treatment on bonding performance of sulphoaluminate cement repairing mortar
2023年第8期
硫铝酸盐水泥;修补砂浆;水灰比;界面;粗糙处理;界面弯拉强度
Sulphoaluminate cement; Repairing mortar; Water-cement ratio; Interface; Rough treatment; Interfacial flexural-tensile strength
2023年第8期
10.19761/j.1000-4637.2023.08.006.05
国家“科技助力经济2020”重点专项项目(2020YFB0312100ZL);山东省自然科学基金项目(ZR2020QE047)。
王业民1,张 贤1,卢晓磊2,杜 鹏2,*
1.济南天荣祥混凝土有限公司,山东 济南 250100;2.济南大学 山东省建筑材料制备与测试技术重点实验室,山东 济南 250022

王业民1,张 贤1,卢晓磊2,杜 鹏2,*

王业民,张贤,卢晓磊,等.界面处理方式对硫铝酸盐水泥修补砂浆黏结性能的影响[J].混凝土与水泥制品,2023(8):6-9,14.

WANG Y M,ZHANG X,LU X L,et al.Influence of interface treatment methods on bonding performance of sulphoaluminate cement repairing mortar[J].China Concrete and Cement Products,2023(8):6-9,14.

浏览量:
1000
摘   要:基于水灰比对硫铝酸盐水泥(SAC)修补砂浆界面弯拉强度的影响,确定了SAC修补砂浆最佳配合比,并研究了增大粗糙度、不同溶液浸润的界面处理方式对SAC修补砂浆新旧界面弯拉强度的影响。结果表明:SAC修补砂浆的3 d界面弯拉强度随着水灰比的减小逐渐增大,当水灰比为0.35时,SAC修补砂浆界面弯拉强度达到最高,为3.82 MPa;对界面进行粗糙处理可显著提高SAC修补砂浆1、3、28 d新旧界面弯拉强度,相较于界面未进行处理组分别提高了1.03、1.08、0.64 MPa;与粗糙处理方式相比,对界面进行水浸润或碱溶液浸润处理均对SAC修补砂浆的新旧界面弯拉强度不利。 Abstract: Based on the influence of water cement-ratio on the interfacial flexural-tensile strength of SAC repairing mortar, the optimal mix proportion of SAC repairing mortar was determined, and the influence of interface treatment methods of increasing roughness and different solution infiltration on the interfacial flexural-tensile strength of SAC repairing mortar was studied. The results show that the 3 d interfacial flexural-tensile strength of SAC repairing mortar gradually increases with the decrease of water-cement ratio. When the water-cement ratio is 0.35, the interfacial flexural-tensile strength of the SAC repairing mortar reaches the highest, which is 3.82 MPa. Roughening the interface can significantly improve the new old interfacial flexural-tensile strength of SAC repairing mortar at 1, 3, 28 d, which is 1.03, 1.08, 0.64 MPa higher than that of the untreated group, respectively. Compared with the rough treatment method, water immersion or alkali solution immersion treatment on the interface is not conducive to the new old interfacial flexural-tensile strength of SAC repairing mortar.
英文名 : Influence of interface treatment on bonding performance of sulphoaluminate cement repairing mortar
刊期 : 2023年第8期
关键词 : 硫铝酸盐水泥;修补砂浆;水灰比;界面;粗糙处理;界面弯拉强度
Key words : Sulphoaluminate cement; Repairing mortar; Water-cement ratio; Interface; Rough treatment; Interfacial flexural-tensile strength
刊期 : 2023年第8期
DOI : 10.19761/j.1000-4637.2023.08.006.05
文章编号 :
基金项目 : 国家“科技助力经济2020”重点专项项目(2020YFB0312100ZL);山东省自然科学基金项目(ZR2020QE047)。
作者 : 王业民1,张 贤1,卢晓磊2,杜 鹏2,*
单位 : 1.济南天荣祥混凝土有限公司,山东 济南 250100;2.济南大学 山东省建筑材料制备与测试技术重点实验室,山东 济南 250022

王业民1,张 贤1,卢晓磊2,杜 鹏2,*

王业民,张贤,卢晓磊,等.界面处理方式对硫铝酸盐水泥修补砂浆黏结性能的影响[J].混凝土与水泥制品,2023(8):6-9,14.

WANG Y M,ZHANG X,LU X L,et al.Influence of interface treatment methods on bonding performance of sulphoaluminate cement repairing mortar[J].China Concrete and Cement Products,2023(8):6-9,14.

摘要
参数
结论
参考文献
引用本文

摘   要:基于水灰比对硫铝酸盐水泥(SAC)修补砂浆界面弯拉强度的影响,确定了SAC修补砂浆最佳配合比,并研究了增大粗糙度、不同溶液浸润的界面处理方式对SAC修补砂浆新旧界面弯拉强度的影响。结果表明:SAC修补砂浆的3 d界面弯拉强度随着水灰比的减小逐渐增大,当水灰比为0.35时,SAC修补砂浆界面弯拉强度达到最高,为3.82 MPa;对界面进行粗糙处理可显著提高SAC修补砂浆1、3、28 d新旧界面弯拉强度,相较于界面未进行处理组分别提高了1.03、1.08、0.64 MPa;与粗糙处理方式相比,对界面进行水浸润或碱溶液浸润处理均对SAC修补砂浆的新旧界面弯拉强度不利。

Abstract: Based on the influence of water cement-ratio on the interfacial flexural-tensile strength of SAC repairing mortar, the optimal mix proportion of SAC repairing mortar was determined, and the influence of interface treatment methods of increasing roughness and different solution infiltration on the interfacial flexural-tensile strength of SAC repairing mortar was studied. The results show that the 3 d interfacial flexural-tensile strength of SAC repairing mortar gradually increases with the decrease of water-cement ratio. When the water-cement ratio is 0.35, the interfacial flexural-tensile strength of the SAC repairing mortar reaches the highest, which is 3.82 MPa. Roughening the interface can significantly improve the new old interfacial flexural-tensile strength of SAC repairing mortar at 1, 3, 28 d, which is 1.03, 1.08, 0.64 MPa higher than that of the untreated group, respectively. Compared with the rough treatment method, water immersion or alkali solution immersion treatment on the interface is not conducive to the new old interfacial flexural-tensile strength of SAC repairing mortar.

扫二维码用手机看
未找到相应参数组,请于后台属性模板中添加

(1)降低水灰比后,相比于空白样,SAC修补砂浆的界面弯拉强度均有较大幅度提升,而且界面弯拉强度随着水灰比的减小逐渐增大。
(2)水浸润处理界面增大了界面处SAC修补砂浆的水灰比,从而降低了界面弯拉强度;碱溶液浸润处理界面能在一定程度上提高SAC修补砂浆的早期界面弯拉强度,但会降低后期界面弯拉强度。
(3)对界面进行单向滑槽粗糙处理后,SAC修补砂浆与旧基体的接触面积增大,各龄期的界面弯拉强度提高幅度明显。

[1] 黄赟.碱激发胶凝材料的研究进展[J].水泥,2011(2):9-13.
[2] 王耀增.高性能水泥基快速修补料的性能研究[D].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学,2015.
[3] BALAZS S K,AKOS T.Failure mechanisms of repair mortar stone interface assessed by pull-off strength tests [J].Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment,2017,76(1):159-167.
[4] LI G X,ZHANG J J,SONG Z P,et al.Improvement of workability and early strength of calcium sulphoaluminate cement at various temperature by chemical admixtures[J].Construction and Building Materials,2018,160:427-439.
[5] 杜鹏,贾斐涵,卢晓磊,等.利用固体废弃物煅烧硫铝酸盐水泥熟料研究进展[J].硅酸盐学报,2022,50(2):340-353.
[6] 李方元,唐新军,胡全,等.硫铝酸盐水泥混凝土的抗硫酸盐侵蚀性能[J].混凝土与水泥制品,2012(10):1-6.
[7] 卢晓磊,张响,郑国法,等.含游离石膏高铁硫铝酸盐水泥熟料的组成设计与性能研究[J].材料导报,2022,36(增刊2):167-172.
[8] 孟祥谦,叶正茂,程新.硫铝酸盐水泥基修补砂浆的力学性能[J].济南大学学报(自然科学版),2010,24(1):1-4. 
[9] DU P,ZHOU Z H,YE Z M,et al.Redispersible polymer powder-modified sulphoaluminate cement mortar[J].Key Engineering Materials,2017,726:495-499.
[10] 扶庭阳,郭保林,罗玉萍,等.超早强硫铝酸盐水泥混凝土修补材料的应用研究[J].混凝土,2018(2):140-144.
[11] 陈凤.不同纤维在硫铝酸盐水泥基快速修补材料中的应用[J].中华建设,2018(1):128-129.
[12] 黄士元,邬长森,杨荣俊.混凝土外加剂对硫铝酸盐水泥水化历程的影响[J].混凝土与水泥制品,2011(1):7-12.
[13] 范昭昂,岳公冰,罗金垒,等.激发剂对掺合料-高贝利特硫铝酸盐水泥砂浆性能的影响[J].混凝土与水泥制品,2022(10): 32-35,39.

[14] 吴凯,康旺,徐玲琳,等.羟乙基甲基纤维素对硫铝酸盐水泥早期水化的影响[J].硅酸盐学报,2020,48(5):615-621.
[15] 黄浩然,廖宜顺,江国喜,等.磷建筑石膏对硫铝酸盐水泥熟料收缩特性的影响[J].建筑材料学报,2022,25(9):893-900.
[16] 中华人民共和国工业和信息化部.修补砂浆:JC/T 2381—2016[S].北京:建材工业出版社,2017.
[17] WANG J J,XIE J H,WANG Y L,et al.Rheological properties, compressive strength, hydration products and microstructure of seawater-mixed cement pastes[J].Cement andConcrete Composites,2020,114:1-15.
[18] WANG C L,SONG M M.Influence of water-cement ratio and type of mixing water on the early hydration performance of calcium sulphoaluminate (SAC) cement[J].Advances in Materials Science and Engineering,2021,25:1-10.
[19] PERROT A,RANGEARD D,PICANDET V,et al.Hydro-mechanical properties of fresh cement pastes containing polycarboxylate superplasticizer[J].Cement and Concrete Research,2013,53:221-228.
[20] ZANOTTI C,ROSTAGNO G,TINGLEY B.Further evidence of interfacial adhesive bond strength enhancement through fiber reinforcement in repairs[J].Construction and Building Materials,2018,160:775-785.

王业民,张贤,卢晓磊,.界面处理方式对硫铝酸盐水泥修补砂浆黏结性能的影响[J].混凝土与水泥制品,2023(8):6-9,14.

WANG Y M,ZHANG X,LU X L,et al.Influence of interface treatment methods on bonding performance of sulphoaluminate cement repairing mortar[J].China Concrete and Cement Products,2023(8):6-9,14.

相关文件

暂时没有内容信息显示
请先在网站后台添加数据记录。

关注《混凝土与水泥制品》

总访问量 468,401   网站统计

官方微信公众号关闭
苏州混凝土水泥制品研究院有限公司

关于我们    |    联系我们    |    订购杂志    |    回到顶部

版权所有:中国混凝土与水泥制品网  苏ICP备10086386号   网站建设:中企动力 苏州

版权所有:中国混凝土与水泥制品网

苏ICP备10086386号

网站建设:中企动力 苏州